Marriage debts and cascading financial effect constitute legal necessity justifying Karta's alienation. Sale of HUF property to repay marriage debts valid even when marriage preceded sale by years.
["Daughter marriage expenses constitute legal necessity","Debts from marriage have cascading effect on finances","Sale to repay marriage debts valid even if marriage preceded sale","Karta wide discretion in determining legal necessity","Trial Court decree dismissing partition suit restored"]
Full text not available for this judgment.