Ved Parkash v. Naresh Kumar

Citation2023/DHC/000327
Bench1-judge
Date of Decision17 January 2023
CategoryHUF Partition
Statutes Cited["Hindu Succession Act 1956 - Section 8","CPC - Order VI Rule 4, Order VII Rule 13","Transfer of Property Act - Section 53A"]
Download Original PDF

Ratio Decidendi

After HSA 1956, inherited ancestral property does not automatically become HUF property. It devolves as self-acquired under Section 8. Coparcenary claims require explicit pleading establishing HUF existence with specific dates and circumstances.

Headnotes

["Post-1956 inherited property not automatically HUF","Section 8 HSA devolution creates self-acquired property","Explicit HUF pleading with foundational facts required","Mere third-generation descent assertion insufficient","Order VI Rule 4 CPC pleading standards must be met"]

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 0 , Cited by 0 ]

Delhi High Court - Orders
Ved Parkash vs Naresh Kumar & Ors on 30 May, 2022

Author: Neena Bansal Krishna

Bench: Neena Bansal Krishna

$~7
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(OS) 270/2022, I.A. 7557/2022
VED PARKASH ..... Plaintiff
Through: Ms. Suman Chaudhary, Advocate
thorugh V.C

versus

NARESH KUMAR & ORS. ..... Defendants
Through: Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, ASC with Ms.
Sheena Priya, Advocate.

CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
ORDER
% 30.05.2022

1. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has appeared through VC and
submits that she has filed details in respect of an HUF property. However,
the same is not on record. Learned counsel for the plaintiff seeks time to file
her submissions.

3. List on 4th August, 2022.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MAY 30, 2022/pa

Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:NIRMLA TIWARI
Signing Date:01.06.2022
16:26:13

Our Analysis

Your Family Home Isn't Automatically Yours by Divya Ramachandran · 8 April 2026